American Huilin Institute http://www.amhuilin.com
Why "mistress cultural" so prevalent in the Chinese officialdom? Seeking root cause, we find it is the law of the "Communist Manifesto". Can not help to make abrupt that Marx could even let himself shame? Carefully reading English translation (see below), it is understandable. Marx textually and logically recognized “the communist community of women”. He should not correlate the relationship of husband-wife with the production relationship, because, even it would be if in the communist societies, the modern production will not completely eliminate.
（from《The Communist Manifesto》Editted by Frederic L. Bender）
For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the communists. the communists have no need to introduce community of women, it has existed almost from time immemorial. . . . . . .
Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce，in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalized community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.